# Moonwell Asset Listing Framework v2

**URL:** <https://forum.moonwell.fi/t/moonwell-asset-listing-framework-v2/724>\
**Category:** Moonwell Improvement Proposal\
**Tags:** moonriver, moonbeam, base\
**Created:** [December 21, 2023, 10:46pm UTC](https://forum.moonwell.fi/t/moonwell-asset-listing-framework-v2/724 "2023-12-21T22:46:38Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thiago](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/ec9cab/32.png) [@thiago](https://forum.moonwell.fi/u/thiago)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2023, 4:35am UTC](https://forum.moonwell.fi/t/moonwell-asset-listing-framework-v2/724/3 "2023-12-22T04:35:24Z")

</div>

Thank you for providing this guideline. The framework looks pretty complete and the risk assessment was very insightful.

I wonder how we should determine the minimum liquidity and %collateral for different assets like liquid-staked-tokens and RWA’s. While RWA’s (like t-bonds) provides more stability (almost like a stablecoin), the lsTOKEN might add another risk layer. In times of black swans, users will have an additional layer of operation for liquidating their positions.

Also, having 3 options of ls-tokens available might fragment the liquidity…

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.moonwell.fi/t/moonwell-asset-listing-framework-v2/724)._