# 🔵 PGov Delegate Pitch **URL:** \ **Category:** Delegation Pitch\ **Created:** [September 18, 2024, 8:59pm UTC](https://forum.moonwell.fi/t/pgov-delegate-pitch/1232 "2024-09-18T20:59:49Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![PGov](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/forum.moonwell.fi/pgov/32/2239_2.png) [@PGov](https://forum.moonwell.fi/u/PGov)\ **Post date:** [September 18, 2024, 8:59pm UTC](https://forum.moonwell.fi/t/pgov-delegate-pitch/1232/1 "2024-09-18T20:59:49Z")
# PGov Delegate Pitch Delegate Name: PGov Delegate Address: PGov.eth (0x3fb19771947072629c8eee7995a2ef23b72d4c8a) Forum Handle: @PGov Email: [PGovTeam@gmail.com](mailto:PGovTeam@gmail.com) Twitter: @PGovTeam ### Statement of Intent We are a team of dedicated governance enthusiasts who have been in the crypto governance space for over four years. Our team were some of the first members involved in defi governance and we want to apply what we have learned over the years to Moonwell. Some of the team has been using Moonwell since the OG Moonbeam days. Recently, with the protocol’s strategic shifts and deployments, we have accrued a small treasure chest of the token ourselves through Morpho incentives. We intend to keep these tokens and continue to build our reserves, aligning ourselves financially with the DAO. We’re excited to become delegates and are grateful to be along for the journey! ### Core Values: - Growth: Our decisions are primarily focused on the growth of the protocol. This often results in how to spend money efficiently, but even more importantly and objecting for unreasonable spends and knowing when to vote no. - Transparency: Clear communication with votes and explanations of reasoning, and an equivalent demand for proposals to do the same. Too often we see thousands, if not millions, being rolled up together and glossed over during proposals. - Accountability: Too often once a decision is done, having proper accountability becomes an afterthought. Whether it’s a DAO promise or a grant or a new program, once a DAO votes something in, we forget about it. Our goal with PGov is to both continue to check in on these decisions as well as ensure that there are proper channels set up to ensure accountability. ### Conflicts of Interest: If situations arise, we will abstain from a vote, and clearly state the conflict on the forums. ---
**Author:** ![PGov](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/forum.moonwell.fi/pgov/32/2239_2.png) [@PGov](https://forum.moonwell.fi/u/PGov)\ **Post date:** [October 16, 2024, 9:35pm UTC](https://forum.moonwell.fi/t/pgov-delegate-pitch/1232/2 "2024-10-16T21:35:16Z")
[[Temp Check] Add Wrapped Super OETH market to Moonwell on Base ](https://snapshot.org/#/moonwell-governance.eth/proposal/0xe2ce58e76e1207ceb4eafc5bf7a2f65b734c97915ee1afdf7eea25aa505cfe9c) We voted **For** : It seems like the whole community is in support of this except for one large whale. Not sure who this delegate was but we’d like to clarity. We have expressed out reasoning further [here](https://forum.moonwell.fi/t/add-wrapped-super-oeth-market-to-moonwell-on-base/1261/4). [MIP-X02 Automated Liquidity Incentive Proposal](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=133) [MIP-B32: Gauntlet’s Base Recommendations](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=134) [MIP-O10: Gauntlet’s Optimism Recommendations](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=135) [MIP-M39: Gauntlet’s Moonbeam Recommendations](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=136) [MIP-B33: Initiating USDC rewards and Assigning Gauntlet as USDC Emissions Admin](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=137) [MIP-X03: Add Wrapped rsETH (wrsETH) Market to Moonwell on Base and Optimism](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=138) We voted **For** : All of these on chain MIP votes are pretty staight forward and we are in support of all of them. We will look to provide further feedback during the snapshot stages now that we are a delegate and fully onboarded for such. ---
**Author:** ![PGov](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/forum.moonwell.fi/pgov/32/2239_2.png) [@PGov](https://forum.moonwell.fi/u/PGov)\ **Post date:** [October 31, 2024, 4:46am UTC](https://forum.moonwell.fi/t/pgov-delegate-pitch/1232/3 "2024-10-31T04:46:50Z")
[MIP-X04 Automated Liquidity Incentive Proposal](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=139) [MIP-B34: Gauntlet’s Base Recommendations](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=141) [MIP-O11: Gauntlet’s Optimism Recommendations](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=142) [MIP-M40: Gauntlet’s Moonbeam Recommendations](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=143) We voted **For** : Again, all of these on chain MIP votes are pretty staight forward and we are in support of all of them. [MIP-X05: Reduce Safety Module Cooldown to 7 Days](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=140) [MIP-M41: Reduce Safety Module Cooldown Period to 7 Days on Moonbeam](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=144) We for **For** : Simlar reasoning for both, we are in favor of this requirement to get involved in governance and are excited to see the increased participation. Some more thoughts: > [@Increasing governance participation 🗳️](https://forum.moonwell.fi/t/increasing-governance-participation/1275/15): > > We like this idea a little more. Tieing direct $ penalties with voting might introduce some issues down the road and not sure but seems like something maybe legally challenging as well. Some way of decreasing or increasing delay of funds seems to be more incentivized. ---
**Author:** ![PGov](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/forum.moonwell.fi/pgov/32/2239_2.png) [@PGov](https://forum.moonwell.fi/u/PGov)\ **Post date:** [November 2, 2024, 2:24am UTC](https://forum.moonwell.fi/t/pgov-delegate-pitch/1232/4 "2024-11-02T02:24:42Z")
[MIP-B35: Create USDC Reward Stream on cbBTC Market and Assign Gauntlet as Emissions Admin Summary](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=145) We voted **For** : Supporting as a baseline for Gauntlet’s market recommendations as long as there’s no contention. [MIP-B36: Enabling Public Allocator Functionality for the Moonwell Flagship EURC Vault](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=146) We voted **For** : Glad to see this public allocator feature set up. We are avid users of Morpho and this specific vault in particular too so nice to see the increased efficiency. ---
**Author:** ![PGov](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/forum.moonwell.fi/pgov/32/2239_2.png) [@PGov](https://forum.moonwell.fi/u/PGov)\ **Post date:** [November 12, 2024, 6:20pm UTC](https://forum.moonwell.fi/t/pgov-delegate-pitch/1232/5 "2024-11-12T18:20:30Z")
[Add wUSDM Market to Moonwell on Optimism ](https://snapshot.org/#/moonwell-governance.eth/proposal/0x27a23e329f06ad7c948e73036d0f657a927427fcfd64024e9b5e349801bb8a73) We voted **For** : We know the Mountain guys well and think they will do a great job at this market on OP. Curious is this is as part of the mandate for another project such as OP grants council grants? [[Temp Check] Add pufETH market to Moonwell on Base ](https://snapshot.org/#/moonwell-governance.eth/proposal/0x01643ca7e73261aaf0317d9c2ee323af44c6ea55a3e3b63abc14697ef3713c85) We voted **For** : The pufETh market is pretty mature and deep on Base. A few money markets and lending protocols have this already integrated, and it would make sense to do it on moonwell as well. ---
**Author:** ![PGov](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/forum.moonwell.fi/pgov/32/2239_2.png) [@PGov](https://forum.moonwell.fi/u/PGov)\ **Post date:** [November 13, 2024, 7:53pm UTC](https://forum.moonwell.fi/t/pgov-delegate-pitch/1232/6 "2024-11-13T19:53:24Z")
**[Migrate Moonwell’s Bug Bounty Program Provider from Immunefi to Code4rena\*\* \*\*](https://snapshot.org/#/moonwell-governance.eth/proposal/0x5f01ad66467e1a44ecf368d779782cb7d9ef7fa1c4a10e232ffd4d9782032015)** We voted **For, Replace Immunefi** : We’ve worked with the ImmuneFi team a lot in the past and overall are very fond of their work. However, if it makes sense to move away and towards a more passive payout system and team, especially given costs, this makes sense. ---
**Author:** ![PGov](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/forum.moonwell.fi/pgov/32/2239_2.png) [@PGov](https://forum.moonwell.fi/u/PGov)\ **Post date:** [November 19, 2024, 1:24pm UTC](https://forum.moonwell.fi/t/pgov-delegate-pitch/1232/7 "2024-11-19T13:24:29Z")
[Additional revenue stream for Moonwell ecosystem via OEV implementation. ](https://snapshot.org/#/moonwell-governance.eth/proposal/0x14846ac838c7a144ffa257d4d8bc39091d30086b0d84eac4dc86263bbaa093d0) We voted **Yes** : This makes total sense and we don’t see any realistic drawdowns. Directing this OEV to protocol reserves is better than losing it to liquidation bots and this initial test on Aero markets makes sense. ---
**Author:** ![PGov](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/forum.moonwell.fi/pgov/32/2239_2.png) [@PGov](https://forum.moonwell.fi/u/PGov)\ **Post date:** [November 21, 2024, 4:53pm UTC](https://forum.moonwell.fi/t/pgov-delegate-pitch/1232/8 "2024-11-21T16:53:36Z")
[MIP-X06 Automated Liquidity Incentive Proposal](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=147) We voted **For** : Sustaining baseline support or these liquidity incentive proposals pending no dissent. ---
**Author:** ![PGov](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/forum.moonwell.fi/pgov/32/2239_2.png) [@PGov](https://forum.moonwell.fi/u/PGov)\ **Post date:** [November 25, 2024, 11:28pm UTC](https://forum.moonwell.fi/t/pgov-delegate-pitch/1232/9 "2024-11-25T23:28:45Z")
[MIP-X07: Gauntlet’s Monthly Recommendations (11/20/2024)](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=148) We voted **For** : Sustaining baseline support for Gauntlet’s market recommendations pending no dissent. [MIP-B38: Renewal of Moonwell Flagship Vaults Incentives Program ](https://snapshot.org/#/moonwell-governance.eth/proposal/0x5532648504670e4ec705d62fe2bb9d835db9c26c0f8befe839c7226a2a2d9cdd) We voted **For** : The first iteration of this we think was a huge success and we are confident that renewing the incentives would be critical to keeping and attracting more users. ---
**Author:** ![PGov](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/forum.moonwell.fi/pgov/32/2239_2.png) [@PGov](https://forum.moonwell.fi/u/PGov)\ **Post date:** [December 12, 2024, 3:39am UTC](https://forum.moonwell.fi/t/pgov-delegate-pitch/1232/10 "2024-12-12T03:39:33Z")
[MIP-X08: Renewal of Moonwell Vaults Incentives Program and Frontier cbBTC Vault …](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=149) We voted **For:** In line with renewing incentives for this vault. We agree with the methodology here. ---
**Author:** ![PGov](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/forum.moonwell.fi/pgov/32/2239_2.png) [@PGov](https://forum.moonwell.fi/u/PGov)\ **Post date:** [December 16, 2024, 4:25am UTC](https://forum.moonwell.fi/t/pgov-delegate-pitch/1232/11 "2024-12-16T04:25:25Z")
[Evaluating OEV Solutions for Moonwell: Community Temperature Check ](https://v1.snapshot.box/#/moonwell-governance.eth/proposal/0x249eb1f1a529911927c7d11b7a33ae52205bef810ba4f18a8c3cc93b5a8ad92e) We voted **Abstain:** Abstaining here as we do not have a strong preference to either and proposed the vote. [Add LBTC to Moonwell Core Market on Base ](https://v1.snapshot.box/#/moonwell-governance.eth/proposal/0x70217f7662620eb7e9aa324e2695cd4128ae17ce504a3fea1f845d89381c2d85) We voted **For:** In favor of adding Lombard BTC onto the main markets on Base. Lombard has grown significantly over the last few months and doing so positions the DAO to grow alongside it’s adoption. [Add WELL to Moonwell Core Market on Base ](https://v1.snapshot.box/#/moonwell-governance.eth/proposal/0x922b3a1415b2397969d3f1bf10e659682fb6d97714c06aa90d7e71159e52bd62) We voted **For:** In favor of adding WELL, given low cautious parameters. [MIP-X09 Automated Liquidity Incentive Proposal](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=150) We voted **For:** Continued support of incentive proposals pending no dissent. [MIP-X10: Gauntlet’s Monthly Recommendations (12/13/2024)](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=151) We voted **For** : Sustaining baseline support for Gauntlet’s market recommendations pending no dissent. [Add USDS to Moonwell Core Market on Base ](https://v1.snapshot.box/#/s:moonwell-governance.eth/proposal/0xef465f86d05ddbc07ba7f8fcbf995e48e4f0815cd298e4a1dbc20d1d695b0aa2) We voted **For** : USDS has proven itself to be a useful and blue ship stablecoin and we are in favor of adding such as a collateral to the core market. [Add tBTC to Moonwell Core Market on Base](https://v1.snapshot.box/#/moonwell-governance.eth/proposal/0x35815ddab865699c74ca9bd08786d46c2dc019f8fc6e167195a11207f420a770) We voted **For** : tBTC has been around for ages and we think ading it here is worthwhile. ---
**Author:** ![PGov](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/forum.moonwell.fi/pgov/32/2239_2.png) [@PGov](https://forum.moonwell.fi/u/PGov)\ **Post date:** [January 11, 2025, 4:52am UTC](https://forum.moonwell.fi/t/pgov-delegate-pitch/1232/12 "2025-01-11T04:52:42Z")
[MIP-B37: Add WELL Market to Moonwell on Base](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=152) We voted **For** : Excited to see this be added and the cautious initial parameters makes sense for the initial onboarding. [VIRTUAL Asset Listing](https://v1.snapshot.box/#/moonwell-governance.eth/proposal/0x06639d080b9b0e972d161fff1e77745f69191595a99f015aa428de01abeac09f) We voted **For** : In similar reasoning to above, this makes a lot of sense and we are in favor of it being added with cautious parameters. [MIP-O12: Solidity Labs’ Oracle Extracted Value (OEV) Solution on ETH Core Market on Optimism](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=153) We voted **For** : Thanks for the team for helping us submit this from after the snapshot stage. We are happy to support this given the community feedback and results for the snapshot. [MIP-X11 Automated Liquidity Incentive Proposal](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=154) We voted **For:** Continued support of incentive proposals pending no dissent. [MIP-X12: Gauntlet’s Monthly Recommendations (01/15/2025)](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=155) We voted **For** : Continued support of Gauntlet’s monthly recommendations pending no dissent. [MIP-B38: Add USDS Market to Moonwell on Base](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=156) We voted **For** : In line with our prior snapshot signal of support. [MIP-B39: Add tBTC Market to Moonwell on Base](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=157) We voted **For** : In line with our prior snapshot signal of support. [MIP-B40: Add LBTC Market to Moonwell on Base](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=158) We voted **For** : In line with our prior snapshot signal of support. [Add VIRTUAL to Moonwell Core Market on Base ](https://v1.snapshot.box/#/moonwell-governance.eth/proposal/0x12acf638b8ca35ef1dd32045ab47cadfabcffd438a653cc72e590c6617852eed) We voted **For** : In favor of Virtuals being added cautiously and should allow for some more risk on borrowers. [MIP-B41: Add VIRTUAL Market to Moonwell on Base](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=159) We voted **For** : In line with our prior snapshot signal of support. ---
**Author:** ![PGov](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/forum.moonwell.fi/pgov/32/2239_2.png) [@PGov](https://forum.moonwell.fi/u/PGov)\ **Post date:** [February 4, 2025, 11:31pm UTC](https://forum.moonwell.fi/t/pgov-delegate-pitch/1232/13 "2025-02-04T23:31:02Z")
[Bolstering Moonwell’s Safety Module: Rewarding Stakers via Reserve Auctions ](https://v1.snapshot.box/#/moonwell-governance.eth/proposal/0x6acded65acc6e21394e3c92ecfc9f12651057966fa346387b1f5c69224cf8d62) We voted **Yes** : In favor of these mechanisms to drive Well rewards and attractiveness in the future. We will be interested to see the exact breakdown in future discussions. Thanks to the team for their hard work on this topic! [Add USDe to Moonwell Core Market on Base and Optimism ](https://v1.snapshot.box/#/moonwell-governance.eth/proposal/0x7790b0011118541b119377735e6309cbfcd88885d1f12974b6e5d589f7fe961d) We voted **Yes** : In favor of adding USDe to these markets. Ethena and USDe has been around for a while now and has quickly become a trusted blue chip. We think adding it here on Base and Optimism with cautious parameters makes sense. [MIP-X13 Automated Liquidity Incentive Proposal](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=160) We voted **For:** Continued support of incentive proposals pending no dissent. [Switch Moonwell’s GLMR Market to using API3’s OEV Enabled Data Feed for GLMR ](https://v1.snapshot.box/#/moonwell-governance.eth/proposal/0x8a96d58b4c1507fc145e52ba2653bc798132af19bc89f3595f26486dab416ce2) We voted **Abstain** : No strong opinions on this, think that this doesn’t add too much benefit but also is not detrimental to change. [Add VVV to Core Market on Base ](https://v1.snapshot.box/#/moonwell-governance.eth/proposal/0x86070b58e6b220baebd7dd3c5366fbbc4cbc5a7bbcdf2f81989a1af3b6994f80) We voted **Abstain** : No strong opinions on this. We are in favor of adding additional collateral types, but are concerned with how new VVV is. Would certainly be worth looking at again in the future we think, just a little early. [Add IDRX to Moonwell Ecosystem on Base](https://v1.snapshot.box/#/moonwell-governance.eth/proposal/0x1299c239b056dd8edf12d861adcfb8e463eb1efd578719372ad20c5c90c8bee0) We voted **Against** : There’s no good reason for IDRX to be added right now we think, and certainly not enough liquidity to do so. [MIP-X14: Expanded Rollout of Solidity Labs’ OEV Solution Across Base and OP Mainnet (Phase 1)](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=161) We voted **For** : Seeing the successful prior rollout, it makes sense to expand in our opinon. ---
**Author:** ![PGov](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/forum.moonwell.fi/pgov/32/2239_2.png) [@PGov](https://forum.moonwell.fi/u/PGov)\ **Post date:** [March 3, 2025, 10:12pm UTC](https://forum.moonwell.fi/t/pgov-delegate-pitch/1232/14 "2025-03-03T22:12:39Z")
[Add MORPHO market to Moonwell on Base ](https://v1.snapshot.box/#/moonwell-governance.eth/proposal/0x4f71d59f807b64ae64e927eb7caf89f8b5adf85a6eff04ad21da6954e88ac473) We voted **For** : There is a lot of synergies between Morpho and Moonwell and it makes sense to allow for Morpho as collateral in a conservative and trial run. [Add AVAIL market to Moonwell on Base ](https://v1.snapshot.box/#/moonwell-governance.eth/proposal/0xdbff5aeeb8a79e7b79ce24bb857e60b95a05fbfbf1c40c867be218dafa734c93) We voted **Abstain** : We think there’s no good reason for AVIAL to be added right now, but not necessarily against it as it is a large and well known project. ---
**Author:** ![PGov](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/forum.moonwell.fi/pgov/32/2239_2.png) [@PGov](https://forum.moonwell.fi/u/PGov)\ **Post date:** [March 19, 2025, 3:02pm UTC](https://forum.moonwell.fi/t/pgov-delegate-pitch/1232/15 "2025-03-19T15:02:04Z")
[MIP-X15: Gauntlet’s Monthly Recommendations (02/19/2025)](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=162) We voted **For** : Continued support of Gauntlet’s monthly recommendations pending no dissent. [MIP-O13: Accept Ownership of Flagship Moonwell USDC Vault on OP Mainnet](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=163) We voted **For** : It makes sense for the ownership of the Flahship Moonwell USDC vault on OP to be owned and recognized as Moonwell core. [MIP-X16 Automated Liquidity Incentive Proposal](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=164) We voted **For** : Continued support of incentive proposals pending no dissent. [Moonwell Security Council - Member Replacement (Ana Bittencourt)](https://v1.snapshot.box/#/moonwell-governance.eth/proposal/0x16c6abd11e6a83cef72f93553967b5451b275b999fa1135c6d0dc8059ac9c09c) We voted **For** : Ana seems to be much more involved and qualified at this stage to be on the security council. NOTE: For MIP-X15, MIP-O13, MIP-X16, our on chain votes seemed not to have gone through/glitched. [MIP-X18: Gauntlet’s Monthly Recommendations (03/18/2025)](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=165) We voted **For** : Continued support of Gauntlet’s monthly recommendations pending no dissent. ---
**Author:** ![PGov](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/forum.moonwell.fi/pgov/32/2239_2.png) [@PGov](https://forum.moonwell.fi/u/PGov)\ **Post date:** [April 1, 2025, 3:47pm UTC](https://forum.moonwell.fi/t/pgov-delegate-pitch/1232/16 "2025-04-01T15:47:12Z")
[Moonwell Asset Listing Framework (MALF) - Implement Additional Review Threshold Requirements ](https://v1.snapshot.box/#/moonwell-governance.eth/proposal/0xbaf101a9aee9c7c3d9ab8d73055e417f30fde795e27cee1b22c2d746aadb387e) We voted **For** : This general framework for listing tokens is a great baseline in order for both the forums to eventually not become spammed with asset listings, but also have some good baseline requirements for anything to be onboarded. [MIP-M42: Switching Moonwell’s GLMR Market to using API3’s OEV Enabled Data Feed for GLMR ](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=169) We voted **For** : Switching over the OEV enabled data feed makes sense. We think starting with these markets, and seeing how they go, should generate a substantial income source for the DAO and this market makes sense as an initial test market. [MIP-B42: Add MORPHO Market to Moonwell on Base ](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=170) We voted **For** : Morpho passes the framework from above and we think is crucial to the success of Moonwell. We believe trialing this now should allow for some unique allocation and efficiency benefits for the DAO going forward! [MIP-X19 Automated Liquidity Incentive Proposal ](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=171) We voted **For** : Continued support of incentive proposals pending no dissent. [MIP-M43 Switching Moonwell’s GLMR Market to using API3’s OEV Enabled Data Feed for GLMR](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=172) We voted **For** : In line with prior vote MIP-M42. [MIP-X20: Gauntlet’s Monthly Recommendations (04/17/2025)](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=173) We voted **For** : Continued support of Gauntlet’s monthly recommendations pending no dissent. ---
**Author:** ![PGov](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/forum.moonwell.fi/pgov/32/2239_2.png) [@PGov](https://forum.moonwell.fi/u/PGov)\ **Post date:** [April 28, 2025, 2:57pm UTC](https://forum.moonwell.fi/t/pgov-delegate-pitch/1232/17 "2025-04-28T14:57:02Z")
**[Add USDT0 market to Moonwell on OP Mainnet](https://v1.snapshot.box/#/moonwell-governance.eth/proposal/0x5bbd9ca3d17190762034d6d57e1c4d80cdd36c5148a741ba6ba759378a98daf1)** We voted **For** : This is a very indepth proposal written by Darren and we applaud him for the details and diligence. USDT0 is a very logical asset to add as Tether focuses expansion efforts on this cross chain capatible asset. ---
**Author:** ![PGov](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/forum.moonwell.fi/pgov/32/2239_2.png) [@PGov](https://forum.moonwell.fi/u/PGov)\ **Post date:** [May 10, 2025, 11:49pm UTC](https://forum.moonwell.fi/t/pgov-delegate-pitch/1232/18 "2025-05-10T23:49:33Z")
**[MIP-X21 Automated Liquidity Incentive Proposal](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=176)** We voted **For** : Continued support of incentive proposals pending no dissent. **[MIP-O14 Add USDT0 Market to Moonwell on Optimism](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=175)** We voted **For** : Similar to our reasoning above in the snapshot. Looking forward to seeing USDT0 onboarded. **[Anthias Labs to Join Moonwell as Risk Partner on Base Markets](https://v1.snapshot.box/#/moonwell-governance.eth/proposal/0x38bba3ecc2c5421f7660e124a8d874c70485aec16b2097520cf8fd217efca86d)** We voted **For** : Seeing the positive sentiment around this, having a secondary risk partner could be a good addition to the DAO in the long run, and short run should provide some interesting asset analysis. **[MIP-X20: Gauntlet’s Monthly Recommendations - 2025-05-14](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=177)** We voted **For** : Continued support of incentive proposals pending no dissent. **[MIP-X22: Gauntlet’s Monthly Recommendations - 2025-05-14](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=178)** We voted **For** : Continued support of Gauntlet’s monthly recommendations pending no dissent. ---
**Author:** ![PGov](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/forum.moonwell.fi/pgov/32/2239_2.png) [@PGov](https://forum.moonwell.fi/u/PGov)\ **Post date:** [June 6, 2025, 11:44pm UTC](https://forum.moonwell.fi/t/pgov-delegate-pitch/1232/19 "2025-06-06T23:44:28Z")
**[MIP-X23 Automated Liquidity Incentive Proposal](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=179)** We voted **For** : Continued support of incentive proposals pending no dissent. **[Add cbDOGE Market to Moonwell on Base](https://v1.snapshot.box/#/moonwell-governance.eth/proposal/0x53a98b610b9fc3cbe13de24c78f30f6613e1a0224b1a4ae94da5ea95d0680165)** **[Add cbXRP Market to Moonwell on Base](https://v1.snapshot.box/#/moonwell-governance.eth/proposal/0x9dc09a532725cabbd441306d52e946a3cd4e37fbd838b3f9f2fff1280e4ff61c)** We voted **For** & **For** : While the process was rushed, we think both assets deserve to be added to Base markets, and makes sense to move forward with these cb assets. ---
**Author:** ![PGov](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/forum.moonwell.fi/pgov/32/2239_2.png) [@PGov](https://forum.moonwell.fi/u/PGov)\ **Post date:** [June 10, 2025, 1:32pm UTC](https://forum.moonwell.fi/t/pgov-delegate-pitch/1232/20 "2025-06-10T13:32:18Z")
**[Switching all Moonbeam Markets to using API3’s Data Feeds to Maximize OEV Recapture](https://v1.snapshot.box/#/moonwell-governance.eth/proposal/0x65d8f8885a4943ee91495bc0d2f684e1892d716eee626810b620177f88304410)** We voted **For** : In favor of switching Moonwell’s API3 data fees to all moonbeam markets following a successful trial. **[MIP-B44: Renewal of Moonwell Vaults Incentives Program](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=182)** We voted **For** : We think these incentives are worth while to continue and extend for now. **[MIP-B43: Add cbXRP to Base Core Markets](https://moonwell.fi/governance/proposal/moonbeam?id=183)** We voted **For** : Voting in line with prior snapshot vote of support for cbXRP **[Add cUSDO (OpenEden) market to MoonWell on BASE](https://v1.snapshot.box/#/moonwell-governance.eth/proposal/0xfe5445a2b87793b59284fb9de383071260e4b3d905bd036a2724a00507279c8e)** We voted **For** : Maintaining an aggressive stance on introducing new collateral types on Moonwell Base markets. [Next page](https://forum.moonwell.fi/t/pgov-delegate-pitch/1232.md?page=2)