# Post-Mortem: MAMO Market Incident on Base

**URL:** <https://forum.moonwell.fi/t/post-mortem-mamo-market-incident-on-base/2208>\
**Category:** Updates\
**Tags:** base\
**Created:** [August 28, 2026, 7:30am UTC](https://forum.moonwell.fi/t/post-mortem-mamo-market-incident-on-base/2208 "2026-08-28T07:30:26Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alej](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/f14d63/32.png) [@Alej](https://forum.moonwell.fi/u/Alej)\
**Post date:** [August 31, 2026, 7:33pm UTC](https://forum.moonwell.fi/t/post-mortem-mamo-market-incident-on-base/2208/3 "2026-08-31T19:33:53Z")

</div>

I’m a MAMO supplier on Base who was never liquidated and has never borrowed against the position (0 borrowed, 100% credit remaining).

As of 31 August the market shows Liquidity of 729.5 MAMO against Total Supplied of 1,262,716.85 and 100% utilization - so my Available to Withdraw is 0.24% of my position.

The post-mortem quantifies residual borrower obligations but doesn’t mention suppliers. Two questions:

1. Is there a remediation path for non-liquidated suppliers in this market, or is the framework scoped to borrowers only, as it was for cbETH?
2. This market’s reserves (1,775,376 MAMO) currently **exceed** its entire Total Supplied (1,262,717 MAMO). Applying reserves to the market would let every supplier exit in full, at a cost of under $10,000 at current prices. Is a reserve reduction being considered? And if a new MAMO market is deployed with a hardened oracle, will suppliers in this market be migrated?

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.moonwell.fi/t/post-mortem-mamo-market-incident-on-base/2208)._