Any thought on why we should not be adding $bnkr bankr.bot ? $vvv $virtual and $bnkr are bases best AI plays. $bnkr started as an agent, but has developed into a full feature platform. Moonwell itself should work on becoming more agentic with mamo strategies etc…
Hi @surfingdegen, thanks for suggesting the addition of a new collateral asset to Moonwell.
After reviewing the asset, unlike $VVV and $VIRTUAL, $BNKR (bankr.bot) currently does not meet the minimum requirements needed to be listed as collateral. One of the main concerns is the absence of a Chainlink price feed, which is a key requirement for reducing oracle-related risk and ensuring reliable pricing for the protocol.
Another important factor is the token’s limited on-chain liquidity, which is still relatively low for collateral onboarding. While supply and borrow caps could help reduce exposure, I believe the overall risk is still significant compared to the potential benefit for the protocol at this stage.
In my opinion, the platform itself is interesting, and the ability for users to create their own AI agents is a strong concept. However, before $BNKR can reasonably be considered as collateral, the token should continue maturing and meet the minimum standards established by the community through the MALF framework.
Once those requirements are met, the process can move forward with a full risk analysis by Anthias Labs. If the asset aligns with the necessary criteria, a Snapshot proposal could then be submitted and, if approved by the community, proceed to an on-chain governance vote to determine whether BNKR should be supported on Moonwell.
1 Like
Hi @Fechuky_25 , I’m kind of new into the Moonwell forum (though it has been a year in the ecosystem). But as $VVV was added as collateral into Moonwell, what about $DIEM?
Hey @koursk, welcome to the forum! I appreciate your participation, and all feedback and comments are welcome.
Before any new asset can be listed, it’s essential to meet a series of prerequisites outlined in the Moonwell Asset Listing Framework v2. This framework provides a clear structure for evaluating assets in terms of security, liquidity, oracle reliability , among other key factors.
Onboarding new collateral assets is not a simple process — it involves a combination of technical, economic, and governance considerations. Each proposed asset must go through a thorough review, as listing unsupported or illiquid tokens could introduce risks such as oracle manipulation, liquidity shortfalls, or liquidation issues.
As part of an initial review, I checked the Chainlink price feeds to confirm whether the asset currently has an existing price feed. Unfortunately, I wasn’t able to find one for $DIEM at this time. The absence of a verified Chainlink feed is a significant consideration, since having an established and secure oracle source is a key requirement for listing on Moonwell markets.
If the asset doesn’t currently have a Chainlink feed, it may be worth reaching out to the project’s team to explore whether they plan to integrate one in the future. Once that’s in place, and the other framework conditions are met, the community can further evaluate the proposal through the formal listing process.