Who are the contributors over governance, and why is there no effort to engage holders? Frustrating af…
Hi @surfingdegen, as the new governance lead, I think it’s important for me to provide some context. We’ve had a very busy few months among Lunar Labs contributors with folks being heads down to focus on the Mamo product, along with getting completely set up with the new risk manager, Anthias Labs.
At the same time, Boardroom is in its last stages of releasing its finalized Superdelegate plan. I’ll let them speak to this more in the near future. In summary, there’s been a lot going on, but to come down a level, I understand that it has been a bit “dead” lately; rest assured, this will not continue as I have a few discussions (i.e., additional tooling for community asset listing, open discussion for new mechanisms and addressing Base competition) that I want to open to the community very soon.
In the meantime, if you or others have ideas specifically around assets, incentives, or improvements you’d like to see, feel free to drop them here or dm me directly on telegram @Mims0x. I want to make sure we are prioritizing what matters most to the community.
Everyone at Lunar Labs and Boardroom appreciates the patience and input from holders like you. To address the matter of asset listings specifically, recall we do have the Coinbase cbWrapped variants that are on the roadmap. We recently added cbXRP, and ideally we will be able to add cbDOGE and cbADA, and other cbWrapped tokens should Coinbase choose to add more. I’ve also been gestating on a few other options myself, but more on this to come.
2 Likes
I appreciate your professionalism in this response. I would love to see this forum become the go to place for ideas and discussion over CT and TG. Happy to freely assist to make this happen.
1 Like